<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Siebel Upgrade – Risks And Challenges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.siebeloracle.com/what-are-risks-and-challenges-while-siebel-upgrade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.siebeloracle.com/what-are-risks-and-challenges-while-siebel-upgrade/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Siebel Support Web For Complete Siebel Reference</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:58:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Konstantins Vasilenko</title>
		<link>http://www.siebeloracle.com/what-are-risks-and-challenges-while-siebel-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-969</link>
		<dc:creator>Konstantins Vasilenko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siebeloracle.com/?p=3718#comment-969</guid>
		<description>&lt;span&gt;Depends on from which version the upgrade is planned. 
	If the application is more than 6-7 years without upgrade, most likely you upgrade analysis will show that reimplementation is the best option, more over it should be staged to ensure reasonable ROI and value to users. 
	But if upgrade is from let&#039;s say 7.8 to 8.1 then main challenge is to ensure proper regression testing. &lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="font-size:10px;"></p><p><span>Depends on from which version the upgrade is planned.<br />
	If the application is more than 6-7 years without upgrade, most likely you upgrade analysis will show that reimplementation is the best option, more over it should be staged to ensure reasonable ROI and value to users.<br />
	But if upgrade is from let&#039;s say 7.8 to 8.1 then main challenge is to ensure proper regression testing. </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.siebeloracle.com/what-are-risks-and-challenges-while-siebel-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-966</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siebeloracle.com/?p=3718#comment-966</guid>
		<description>&lt;span&gt;I second what Mahesh said. Scope creep is a major challenge, and third-party/supporting applications introduce more variables. These shouldn&#039;t be underestimated. &lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="font-size:10px;"></p><p><span>I second what Mahesh said. Scope creep is a major challenge, and third-party/supporting applications introduce more variables. These shouldn&#039;t be underestimated. </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mayank Kumar</title>
		<link>http://www.siebeloracle.com/what-are-risks-and-challenges-while-siebel-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-965</link>
		<dc:creator>Mayank Kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siebeloracle.com/?p=3718#comment-965</guid>
		<description>&lt;span&gt;If the customization is high in legacy then go in for reimplementation rather than upgrade. It also depends upon business criticality fo this application (higher the criticality more the regression you&#039;ll need). &lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="font-size:10px;"></p><p><span>If the customization is high in legacy then go in for reimplementation rather than upgrade. It also depends upon business criticality fo this application (higher the criticality more the regression you&#039;ll need). </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

